China says the balloon is theirs but not used for spying. Here’s what we know

National Security

China says the balloon is theirs but not used for spying. Here’s what we know

Enlarge this image

A high altitude balloon floats over Billings, Mont., on Wednesday. The U.S. is tracking a suspected Chinese surveillance balloon that has been spotted over U.S. airspace.

Larry Mayer/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Larry Mayer/AP

A high altitude balloon floats over Billings, Mont., on Wednesday. The U.S. is tracking a suspected Chinese surveillance balloon that has been spotted over U.S. airspace.

Larry Mayer/AP

The prospect of a Chinese spy balloon flying over the continental U.S. was probably not on the radar of many Americans until Thursday, when the Pentagon said it was monitoring one such device.

The Pentagon said Thursday that it has “very high confidence” that the high-altitude surveillance balloon came from China and is being used to collect information from sensitive sites.

China’s foreign affairs ministry confirmed on Friday that the balloon is theirs, calling it a “civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological purposes,” that had gone off course by accident.

“Affected by the Westerlies and with limited self-steering capability, the airship deviated far from its planned course,” it said in a statement. “The Chinese side regrets the unintended entry of the airship into US airspace due to force majeure. The Chinese side will continue communicating with the US side and properly handle this unexpected situation caused by force majeure.

U.S. defense officials believe it does not pose a “military or physical threat to people on the ground,” as NORAD and U.S. Northern Command said in a statement, and recommended against shooting it down.

Canada also says it’s monitoring a high-altitude surveillance balloon, though it’s not clear if it’s the same one. (U.S. officials said the balloon they are tracking flew over the Aleutian Islands and through Canada before it was spotted Wednesday over Billings, Montana.)

“Canadians are safe and Canada is taking steps to ensure the security of its airspace, including the monitoring of a potential second incident,” the Canadian Department of National Defence said in a brief statement on Thursday.

Mao Ning, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson, previously told reporters that China has “no intention of violating the territory or airspace of any sovereign country” and urged people to remain calm and avoid speculation until all the facts are clear.

Still, some Republican lawmakers — including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke — are accusing China of provoking the U.S. and calling for the U.S. to address it.

The incident comes at a tense time for U.S.-China relations, with American national security concerns ranging from TikTok to Taiwan.

And it’s making headlines less than a week before U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, as part of an effort to diffuse those tensions. He would be the first Biden administration Cabinet secretary to visit China.

That trip still appears to be on, albeit more complex now. Here’s what else we know so far.

What is a surveillance balloon?

These large balloons carry cameras or other equipment and float above a given area, usually at an altitude of about 80,000 to 120,000 feet, The Guardian reports. In contrast, commercial planes generally fly at about 35,000 feet.

Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder has said the balloon is “currently traveling at an altitude well above commercial air traffic.”

The National Parks Service says the use of spy balloons within the U.S. dates back to the Civil War, when both sides used hot air balloons (usually tethered to the ground and reaching about 1,000 feet) to collect reconnaissance and direct artillery towards the other.

The practice became more widespread during World War I and then during the Cold War, when the U.S. launched hundreds of balloons to gather intelligence on China and the Soviet Union, Bloomberg reports.

Surveillance balloons have been overshadowed by satellites and unmanned drones in recent decades, though they still offer certain advantages (for instance, they’re cheaper to launch and can conduct long-duration surveillance missions). Politico reported last year that the Pentagon was expanding investment in high-altitude balloon projects.

What is it looking for?

U.S. officials said Thursday that the U.S. had been tracking the balloon since it entered U.S. airspace a few days ago. They didn’t specify its exact timeline or path other than to confirm it floated over Montana at one point (the white circle is so large that people could spot it from the ground).

Officials have broadly said it was flying over sensitive sites to collect information.

Montana is home to one of America’s three nuclear missile silo fields at Malmstrom Air Force Base, which could be of interest, NPR national security correspondent Greg Myre told All Things Considered.

“The U.S. and China are always trying to gather intelligence on each other, but usually not in a way like this that is so obvious and almost certain to be detected,” he added.

Why didn’t the U.S. shoot it down?

A senior defense official told reporters Thursday that the U.S. had prepared fighter jets to shoot down the balloon if ordered, but that the Pentagon recommended against it, in part because of the risk that debris from such a large balloon could pose to people on the ground.

“It doesn’t seem that this balloon is capable of gathering intelligence that would be significantly beyond what could also already be gathered by, say, satellites,” Myre added.

But, he said, the U.S. is using some of those fighter jets to “take a peek” at the balloon in its efforts to keep monitoring it.

For its part, Canada’s defense department says it is in frequent contact with the U.S. as the situation develops.

“Canada’s intelligence agencies are working with American partners and continue to take all necessary measures to safeguard Canada’s sensitive information from foreign intelligence threats,” it said.

When has this happened before?

The Pentagon said similar balloon activity has been seen on occasion in recent years.

A defense official “wouldn’t characterize this as revolutionary,” Myre reports, adding that what seems to be different this time around is the altitude of the balloon and the length of time that it’s staying over the U.S.

The U.S. Naval Institute pointed to one not-so-recent memory in a Thursday evening tweet: During World War II, the crew of the USS New York spotted a sphere in the sky that they suspected was a Japanese balloon. After multiple successful attempts at shooting it down, they realized they were actually shooting at Venus.

What does this mean for Blinken’s trip to China?

Tensions were already high this week, when the U.S. announced it would expand its presence in Southeast Asia with access to more bases in the Philippines — a move China said would threaten security in the region.

The balloon situation puts the two countries at odds even before Blinken goes to China and has given China hawks in the U.S. more material to seize on, as NPR’s Beijing correspondent Emily Feng tells Morning Edition.

“The U.S. and China have been trying to stabilize their relationship, but this incident and ongoing bipartisan efforts to increase sanctions on China get in the way of that,” she explains.

Blinken’s trip to China hasn’t been officially confirmed by either side, Feng adds, though he is expected to leave on Sunday.

Not much is expected to come out of their meeting, especially now. U.S. officials and former diplomats tell Feng it might result in a joint statement, perhaps about combating climate change or against the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine, but no major breakthroughs are likely.

Still, they say talking is better than nothing — and the fact that Blinken is going to China at all is seen as progress.

“There are some meaty issues at the heart of their relationship over human rights, combating climate change, technological competition,” Feng says. “So that involves getting China on board, even if the two countries don’t see eye to eye.”